Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Bibiane Schoofs Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Wilda Hennemann vs B. Schoofs

Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
SWE
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
37
-
Height
1.70m
477
C. Rank
869
283
Best Rank
142
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$166.4K
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Bibiane Schoofs
NED
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
37
-
Height
1.70m
477
C. Rank
869
283
Best Rank
142
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$166.4K
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Hennemann 1 - 0 Schoofs
They have played 2 sets in total, with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann winning 2 and Bibiane Schoofs winning 0. The last match between Caijsa Wilda Hennemann and Bibiane Schoofs was at the W25 Helsinki, 15-11-2022, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hennemann | 1 |
| Schoofs | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W25 Helsinki(11-15-22)
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
6
7
Bibiane Schoofs
4
5
C. W. Hennemann vs B. Schoofs H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $166,421 |
| 64.36% (195-108) | Career Total W/L | 59.49% (376-256) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. W. Hennemann vs B. Schoofs Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has won 35.20% of points on their second serve, while Bibiane Schoofs has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Caijsa Wilda Hennemann, in recent form, has won 54.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bibiane Schoofs has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.94% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has saved 46.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bibiane Schoofs has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has won 81.25% of matches played (W/L 26/6), with Bibiane Schoofs winning 50.00% (W/L 1/1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 154/82), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/17). Bibiane Schoofs has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 231/137), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/11).
- Player level: In the last year, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 76.00% of matches (W/L 19/6), where as Bibiane Schoofs has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 1/1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann winning 1 times and Bibiane Schoofs being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann winning 2 and Bibiane Schoofs winning 0.
- The last match between Caijsa Wilda Hennemann and Bibiane Schoofs was at the W25 Helsinki, 15-11-2022, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has played against opponents with an average rank of 352.72 while Bibiane Schoofs has played against players with an average rank of 497.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bibiane Schoofs has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has converted 45.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bibiane Schoofs has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Bibiane Schoofs Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. W. Hennemann vs B. Schoofs H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:29:0 | Average Match Time | 1:29:0 |
| 48% (30/62) | 1st Serve % | 69% (42/61) |
| 60% (18/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (23/42) |
| 44% (14/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (6/19) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 80% (4/5) |
| 52% (32/61) | Return Points Win % | 48% (30/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Hennemann 44%, Schoofs 34%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Hennemann 63%, Schoofs 68%.
Break Points Saved %: Hennemann 54%, Schoofs 57%.
C. W. Hennemann Recent Matches Played
B. Schoofs Recent Matches Played

C. W. Hennemann vs B. Schoofs Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.36% (195/108) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.49% (376/256) |
| 61.19% (421/267) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.65% (833/612) |
| 54.92% (3385/2779) | Games Win/Loss | 53.55% (6984/6057) |
| 63.64% (14/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 49.59% (60/61) |
| 65.25% (154/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.77% (231/137) |
| 60.00% (27/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.79% (76/47) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 45.00% (9/11) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 241 | Aces Total | 414 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 496 | Total Double Faults | 1597 |
| 1:34:3 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 500.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 545.54 |
| 67% (11837/17694) | 1st Serve % | 64% (13881/21577) |
| 57% (6747/11837) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (8381/13881) |
| 47% (2747/5875) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (3273/7696) |
| 51% (1244/2417) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1347/2776) |
| 50% (8472/17094) | Return Points Win % | 47% (9957/21378) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 30.77% (8/18) |
| 60.00% (9/6) | Cups W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 42.59% (23/31) |
| 56.69% (89/68) | Challenger W/L | 60.00% (210/140) |
| 74.05% (97/34) | Futures W/L | 68.21% (133/62) |
| 64% (192/300) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (365/615) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 57% (25/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (67/122) |
| 60% (50/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (103/194) |
| 88% (194/171) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (366/317) |
| 12% (194/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (366/48) |
| 22% (109/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (266/57) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
01:00 PM 27/10/25
PredictionW1
2.12
W2
1.72
08:10 AM 27/10/25
PredictionW1
3.02
W2
1.35
01:00 PM 27/10/25
PredictionW1
2
W2
1.75
01:00 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
1.26
W2
3.84
04:00 PM 27/10/25
PredictionW1
2.42
W2
1.56
01:00 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
2.27
W2
1.63
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
27 Oct 2025
Ena Shibahara vs Anastasia Zakharova Prediction – WTA Jiangxi Open – 27th October 2025 Best Bets
27 Oct 2025
Cristina Bucsa vs Yexin Ma Prediction – WTA Hong Kong Tennis Open – 27th October 2025 Best Bets
27 Oct 2025
Ella Seidel vs Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah Prediction – WTA Jiangxi Open – 27th October 2025 Best Bets
27 Oct 2025
Yulia Putintseva vs Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva Prediction – WTA Jiangxi Open – 27th October 2025 Best Bets
27 Oct 2025
Sijia Wei vs Anna Bondar Prediction – WTA Jiangxi Open – 27th October 2025 Best Bets
27 Oct 2025
Tamara Korpatsch vs Polina Kudermetova Prediction – WTA Jiangxi Open – 27th October 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
22:00
H2H 3-2
13:00
H2H 3-1
17:30
H2H 2-1
20:30
H2H 1-2
13:00
H2H 1-1